![]() ![]() Rosetta Stone is quite simple (just a “fancy flash card sort of setup” according to this comment), there is “no human being to explain why certain things are the way they are” (see this comment), it can be unclear what pictures shown are supposed to mean, their speech recognition feature is “highly ineffective” (see this comment) and “it’s almost laughable how inaccurate some of the phrases they teach are” (see this comment). To summarize, here’s how Rosetta Stone stacks up: while several people have said good things about Rosetta Stone and benefited from it, there is a significant amount of criticism for it as well, and it seems that for many people there would be better resources to use. This article is a compilation of all the best comments I got back. But is Rosetta Stone actually effective? To find out, I put out this simple query:įor people who have used Rosetta Stone to learn a language, what did you think of it and would you recommend it to others? All comments welcome. The company’s been around since 1992 and has well over 1,000 employees and revenue somewhere in the ~$250 million per year range. Rosetta Stone is a giant in the language learning industry, with practically anyone who has ever tried to learn a new language having heard of it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |